Evidence of perjured testimony requires new trial on motion for new trial
Tex-On Motor v. Trans South Financial (Tex.App.–Houston [14th Dist.] March 16, 2006)(Seymore) [Motion for new trial erroneously denied; new evidence of perjured testimony on controlling fact requires reversal] DISMISSED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART: Opinion by Justice Charles W. Seymore Before Justices Edelman, Seymore and Guzman 14-04-00366-CV Tex-On Motor Center v. Trans South Financial Corporation, Roy D. Fitzpatrick and Marsha J. Fitzpatrick Appeal from Co Civil Ct at Law No 4 of Harris County
De Mino v. Sheridan (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] April 20, 2006, pet. denied)(Seymore) AFFIRMED: Opinion by Justice Charles Seymore [judicial communications privilege protects even perjured testimony] AFFIRMED: Opinion by Justice Seymore Before Justices Hudson, Fowler and Seymore 14-05-00210-CV Wolfgang Hirczy De Mino v. Edward P. Sheridan, Jerald W. Strickland, In His Official Capacity as Successor to Edward P. Sheridan in the Office of Provost at the University of Houston Appeal from 281st District Court of Harris County (Hon. Grant Dorfman)