August 2006 Texas Supreme Court Opinions

Also see: January - June 2006 Supreme Court Opinions  Most Recent 2006 Opinions
Also see: September 2006 Texas Supreme Court Opinions | 2007 Opinions


City of Midland v. Goerlitz, No. 03-0185 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)

City of Houston v. United Water Services, No. 04-0547 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)         

Port Neches-Groves ISD v. Pyramid Constructors, No. 04-0737 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)         
   
Metro v. MEB Engineering, No. 04-0757 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)

City of  Irving v. Inform Construction, No. 04-0984 (Tex. Aug 31, 2006)(per curiam)

Fiess v. State Farm Lloyds, No. 04-1104 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(Aug 31, 2006)(
Brister)(certified question from
5th Circuit)    

In re Applied Chemical Magnesias Corp., No. 04-1119 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(
Green)

City of Angleton v. Usfilter Operating Servc’s Inc., No. 05-0098 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
   
City of San Antonio v. Hartman, No. 05-0147 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(
Brister)

Blue Cross Blue Shield v. Duenez, No. 05-0521 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)         

Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, No. 05-0534 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)

Pena v. McDowell, No. 05-0546 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)          

LMB, Ltd v. Moreno, No. 05-0764 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)

In re The Hon. Errlinda Castillo, No. 06-0314 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(
Jefferson)


Cases with Links to Opinions

August 31, 2006

City of Midland v. Goerlitz No. 03-0185 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
THE CITY OF MIDLAND v. ROGER GOERLITZ, D/B/A AMERICAN WOOD WASTE RECYCLING; from Midland
County; 8th district (08‑02‑00087‑CV, 101 S.W.3d 573, 01‑30‑03)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion


City of Houston v. United Water Services No. 04-0547 (Tex. Aug 31, 2006)(per curiam)
CITY OF HOUSTON v. UNITED WATER SERVICES, INC.; from Harris County; 1st district (01‑02‑01057‑CV,
137 S.W.3d 747, 04‑29‑04)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion


Port Neches-Groves ISD v.Pyramid Constructors,  No. 04-0737 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
PORT NECHES-GROVES INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. PYRAMID CONSTRUCTORS, INC.; from
Jefferson County; 9th district (09‑03‑00589‑CV, 140 S.W.3d 440, 07‑01‑04)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion


Metro v. MEB Engineering No. 04-0757 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY v. M.E.B. ENGINEERING, INC.; from Harris County; 1st district
(01‑04‑00022‑CV, 176 S.W.3d 300, 07‑15‑04)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion


City of Irving v. Inform Construction No. 04-0984 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
CITY OF IRVING v. INFORM CONSTRUCTION, INC.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05‑03‑01460‑CV, 143
S.W.3d 371, 08‑09‑04)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion


Fiess v. State Farm Lloyds , No. 05-1104 (Tex. Aug 31, 2006)(Brister)(certified question from Fifth Circuit)
[insurance, mold coverage, contract construction]
RICHARD FIESS AND STEPHANIE FIESS v. STATE FARM LLOYDS
motion to strike post-submission brief denied
motion to strike post-submission supplemental brief denied
motion for sanctions denied
The Court answers the question certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Justice Brister delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice Hecht, Justice
Wainwright, Justice Green, Justice Johnson, and Justice Willett
Justice Medina delivered a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice O'Neill
("Courts adhere to prior precedents for reasons of efficiency, fairness, and legitimacy.[49] For more than a
century this Court has held that in construing insurance policies “where the language is plain and
unambiguous, courts must enforce the contract as made by the parties, and cannot make a new contract for
them, nor change that which they have made under the guise of construction.”[50] If the political branches of
Texas government decide that mold should be covered in Texas insurance policies, they have tools at their
disposal to do so; Texas courts must stick to what those policies say, and cannot adopt a different rule when a
“crisis” arises.")
Accordingly, for the reasons and to the extent stated in this opinion, we answer the certified question “No.”
Justice Medina delivered a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice O'Neill


In Re Applied Chemical Magnesias Corp. No. 04-1119(Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(Justice Green)
IN RE APPLIED CHEMICAL MAGNESIAS CORPORATION; from San Saba County; 3rd district
(03‑04‑00567‑CV, ___ S.W.3d ___, 10‑15‑04)
The Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus.
Justice Green delivered the opinion of the Court


City of Angleton v. US Filter Operating Serv'cs No. 05-0098 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
CITY OF ANGLETON v. USFILTER OPERATING SERVICES, INC.; from Brazoria County; 14th district
(14‑04‑00603‑CV, ___ S.W.3d ___, 12‑23‑04)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.
Per Curiam Opinion


City of San Antonio v. Hartman No. 05-0147 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(Brister)
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO v. MARK HARTMAN, ET AL.; from Bexar County; 4th district (04‑04‑00162‑CV, 155
S.W.3d 460, 11‑10‑04)
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.
Justice Brister delivered the opinion of the Court [ pdf ]
(Justice Green not sitting)


Blue Cross v. Duenez No. 05-0534 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS AND HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION, A MUTUAL LEGAL
RESERVE COMPANY v. XAVIER DUENEZ AND WIFE, IRENE DUENEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIENDS
OF ASHLEY DUENEZ, A MINOR; from Calhoun County; 13th district (13‑03‑00481‑CV, ___ S.W.3d ___,
05‑26‑05)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court vacates the court of appeals' judgment and dismisses the case for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam Opinion


Ross v. Nat. Ctr. for the Employment of the Disabled No. 05-0534 (Tex. Aug. 31, 2006)(per curiam)
RICHARD M. ROSS v. NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE DISABLED, AS SUCCESSOR IN
INTEREST TO ACCESS HEALTHSOURCE, INC., ASSIGNEE OF O.R. BROOKER, ET AL.; from El Paso County;
8th district (08‑04‑00001‑CV, 170 S.W.3d 635, 05‑26‑05)
respondent's motion to dismiss petition for review denied
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.
Per Curiam Opinion


Pena v. McDowell, No. 05-0546 (Tex. 2006)(per curiam)
WILLIAM ESPINOZA PEÑA v. DAVID MCDOWELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, ET AL.;
from Anderson County; 12th district (12‑05‑00116‑CV, ___ S.W.3d ___, 05‑11‑05)
motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction denied
petitioner's motions to take judicial notice in the interest of justice denied
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to that court.
Per Curiam Opinion


LMB v. Morena, No. 05-0764 (Tex. 2006)(per curiam)
[premises liability]
LMB, LTD. v. ROSA MARIA MORENO, ET AL.; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13‑02‑00290‑CV,
___ S.W.3d ___, 06‑16‑05)
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.
Per Curiam Opinion


In Re Hon. Castillo No. 06-0314 (Tex. 2006)(Jefferson)
IN RE THE HONORABLE ERRLINDA CASTILLO, JUSTICE, THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRTEENTH
DISTRICT OF TEXAS, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY
as supplemented respondents' motion to dismiss without prejudice denied
Chief Justice Jefferson delivered the opinion of the Court

TEXAS SUPREME COURT OPINIONS
(Tex. 2006)

2006 Opinons by Chief Justice Jefferson
2006 Opinions by Justice Brister  
2006 Opinions by Justice Green
2006 Opinions by Justice Hecht  
2006 Opinions by Justice Johnson   
2006 Opinions by Justice Medina   
2006 Opinions by Justice O'Neill  
2006 Opinions by Justice Wainwright   
2006 Opinions by Justice Willett

Texas Supreme Court Statistics